Gail's Family Child Care Llc - Canton, Oh

You know about how individuals gain command of the ability of the State and and so abuse that power like onetime US President George "Dubya" Bush-league?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly assisting for some Usa businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious globe security threat when Iraq did not and when information technology had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'off-white game' for Bush UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush-league was supported by United kingdom Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to bring together the Us with faked "intelligence" of Republic of iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did non exist just which Blair claimed could exist deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save u.s.a. all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this 24-hour interval.

On CHS nosotros wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the illness came about every bit a result of the interaction of three completely unlike factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living weather condition, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to piece of work ipso facto proves itself non to have:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was particularly the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading illness: London'south first park built afterward rich feared illness spread from slums United kingdom The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would go along them prophylactic from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "peachy unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed equally many or more than than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, United states of america, Sweden.

Now you lot tin read a relatively brusque but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- Britain, U.s.a. & SWEDEN

In the graphs beneath notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more than people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the illness dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, every bit the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did non.  On whatsoever scientific assay of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the refuse in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the United kingdom and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [come across table below].  Leicester's approach also price far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Tabular array 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Pocket-sized-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Regular army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.ane
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	two,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.ane

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, then that they may be compared either style with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive pocket-sized-pox fatality of Nihon, of the British Ground forces, and of the Royal Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would beget an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—simply on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Toll, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Status	Minor-Pox Cases	Small-scale-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	nine.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	thirty	iv.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the budgeted influenza season and the enthusiastic calls to utilize the flu vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an endeavour to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same basic tale of the bright observation of a simple land doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as information technology was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'southward cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'south hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, but nothing more. After, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit balmy, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once again; again, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner'southward idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would exist tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not different the archetype Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly serpent-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, especially those that are used to back up a belief, achieve an iconic status while whatsoever unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small-scale amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This thought was introduced to the Western globe by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with noesis of the practice of inoculation confronting smallpox, known as variolation. This blazon of inoculation was just a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do ameliorate against the illness than if they contracted information technology at some peradventure less desirable time and place in the time to come.

The idea was embraced past the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an performance that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[three] The procedure did often help protect the private that was inoculated, but in that location was still an estimated 2-5% that died as a outcome.[4,v] Still, this was an improvement compared to a twenty-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[vi] Merely, was the divergence in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more than nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of lodge?

At that place was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more than deaths than there would accept been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread information technology. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later on, and establish that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, considering it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably similar the plague a contagious disease, what tends to finish the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increment that danger; the practise of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious illness is produced past Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a middle of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[seven]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had get a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease thing that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox every bit a test to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results challenge lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with just rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Physician-Convivial Club, Jenner was ridiculed over his practise.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could take told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [viii]

From the beginning in that location were problems with Jenner'due south procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox affair obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results considering they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the process would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to encompass Jenner's ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early on reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were notwithstanding dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the cease of the year 1799. A month subsequently it was inoculated with pocket-sized-pox matter without effect, and a few months afterward took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Hazard, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years subsequently she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, iii years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted modest-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in Oct 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. fourteen. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an xviii% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate equally smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a straight challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another commodity in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination by the most skillful practitioners, is now alarmingly groovy.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Dark-brown, a surgeon with xxx years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Only after vaccinating ane,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, later on vaccination, people still could contract and even dice from smallpox, and that he could no longer back up the practice.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the fourth dimension were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to cover it as a new form of income. It is therefore quite meaning for a md to have spoken out against information technology as Dr. Brownish did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could besides be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, ii [1820-1822] at that place was a swell hubbub about the pocket-sized-pox. It broke out with the bang-up epidemic to the north . . . Information technology pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and frequently severely; almost to expiry; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some lonely, merely fell upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English language pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to exist an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-pox afterwards, and take either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![fifteen]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that fabric was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the side by side person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, simply as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and in that location were calls to obtain fresh fabric directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine cloth came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new illness.[18] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more than smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a human being who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a moo-cow'south udder. He then took pus from that cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A later research determined that this was nothing more than the onetime practice of smallpox inoculation.[xx]

Not simply was vaccination declining and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were also reports of deaths from other causes soon afterwards vaccination. For example, a skin condition called erysipelas was a especially prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a male child from Somers-boondocks, aged 5 years, "minor-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the married woman of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (eight days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a saccharide bakery, aged xiii weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Considering arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

Start I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted past vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more than, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As information technology became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what information technology was promised to be, refusals increased. In gild to deal with this, the judicial organization intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a fix of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, in that location were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, at that place were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the about severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no event at all (Graph one). In fact, more than people died in the 20 years later the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the xx years earlier.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every x years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out confronting the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made by vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the force of law created the perfect surround that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators take received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get almost a quarter million. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, accept been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced and so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Withal, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics connected to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were xx-three thousand four hundred and 60-ix cases of small-scale-pox in that regular army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and xc-ii small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand eight hundred and fifty-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than than one hundred and xx-two thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one 1000000 vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine motility. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some fifty-fifty accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the swell demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same twelvemonth Leicester'south authorities, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. Past 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to ten%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the demand for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the bulk of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town'southward residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to laissez passer. Depression vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[xxx] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph ii). Leicester showed that past abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed every bit the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an heart-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial examination of an experience extending over a period of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-size-pox and far less afflicted by that affliction since information technology abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-5 per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted as a safe procedure, it ofttimes caused sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the aforementioned (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph iii: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph iv: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe blazon of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed one in v of its victims to 1 that only killed anywhere from ane in 50 and later to as low as one in 380. The illness could yet kill, only having get then much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or peel eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the Southward and afterwards gradually spread over the state. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The writer of a 1913 commodity in The Periodical of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was effectually 20%, equally it had been historically. The table as well showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low equally 0.26% by 1908. Every bit the balmy form of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this fourth dimension, considered a mild disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable illness of childhood, and is chiefly important because it oftentimes gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of balmy smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very hard to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced fiddling in the way of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although in that location has been no protection by vaccination, the grade of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was non a major issue, the exercise of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox death in the United States in 1948 upward until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 report detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, at present being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to exist betwixt 1 in xx,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality charge per unit of 4 to 40%.[35] However, they acknowledged that most cases were non reported and at that place was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were besides an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the issue of smallpox vaccination, while during the aforementioned time there had but been 1 smallpox expiry in 1948.[36]

The final smallpox death in the United States post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, merely since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is even so occurring today, equally recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected past his military father after the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother as well required handling and virus was establish all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United states of america. If the deaths were this high in a land with a modern health-intendance organisation, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire earth?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which in one case had the suffrage of the nation has at present hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are aback to jettison the thought completely and perchance afraid that if we did the accident of some futurity epidemic might put us in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural expiry and are relieved that the general public is non curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the merely medically promoted style to deal with illness, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient production that is fabricated through fermentation of a multifariousness of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acrid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" every bit applied to small-scale pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a safety in pocket-sized-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the rubber treatment died, while among those nether ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to accept care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the affliction. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a existent preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past accept been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the forepart in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will have two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The give-and-take may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, merely only considering well-nigh people accept been conditioned to take the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, illness-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected brute'due south (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and haemorrhage. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or simply an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of good for you collagen. Collagen is the poly peptide that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a effect, literally comes unglued and falls autonomously.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Section of Rex's College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and booze while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California lord's day. The vitamin C-scarce diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilt miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried salary or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed downwards with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same fourth dimension subjected to the well-nigh intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Aureate Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice equally many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases equally those killed in boxing.[44] For instance, the causes of decease listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of expiry, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a minor fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died equally a result of their wounds deemed only for i percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all profoundly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph five & half-dozen).

Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph six: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale fable of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a colonnade of their vaccine faith. Merely the true history shows us a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the globe psyche equally something to protect someone from an illness. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction thing into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, diet, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective retentiveness. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'due south great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, practise more and more vaccines seem like a skilful idea to you?

More data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies tin can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which tin exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, Doc, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
v.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Nowadays State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
vi.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Cognition and the 'Opening' of Nippon, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Mag and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
eight.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Example Against Vaccination, Goddard'south Rooms, Gloucester, Jan 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
x.William Scott Tebb, Medico, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Human activity of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Viii, July-Dec, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 583.
fifteen.William Cobbett, Communication to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
sixteen.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. four, 1834, p. 796.
xix.Ephraim Cutter, Physician, "Partial Study on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United states," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning time Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Report of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Country of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, Apr 1911, vol. 19, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, MD, "A Medico's Argument Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, April sixteen, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Dr., "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Non by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Minor-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. 3, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious disease equally Shown past the History of Smallpox in the United states," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. ii, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the do of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Book 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos Medico, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. x.
38.Maggie Play tricks, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January one, 1938, pp. 48-49.
twoscore."Acetic Acid in Blood-red Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. i, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January xv, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. Six, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Male monarch's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January four to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Written report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Kid Wellness Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Condom, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, authorities, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines |

smithnottakeling.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post